Table of Contents
When I first considered testing a Shark Self Emptying Robot Vacuum, I was curious whether a brand known for excellent traditional vacuums could compete in the robot vacuum space. My experience with Shark’s upright and cordless models has been overwhelmingly positive. Could they replicate that success with automation?
The robot vacuum market is dominated by names like iRobot, ECOVACS, and Roborock. These brands command premium pricing, often exceeding $1,000 for flagship models. Shark enters this space with aggressive mid-range pricing whilst promising comparable features. The Matrix Plus 2-in-1 costs around $550-$650, positioning it squarely between budget and premium tiers.
What caught my attention about the Shark Matrix Plus specifically? It promises self-emptying convenience, vacuuming and mopping capability, and Shark’s Matrix Clean navigation technology. All whilst undercutting premium competitors by $400-$800. That value proposition demanded investigation.
But here’s the critical question: are you sacrificing performance for savings? Does Shark’s engineering translate from traditional vacuums to autonomous robots? These questions matter when you’re investing $600 in automated floor cleaning.
I’ve been testing the Shark Matrix Plus 2-in-1 Robot Vacuum & Mop (model RV2610WA) for two months in my 1,800 square foot home. I’ve run it daily on hardwood, tile, and carpet. I’ve tested the mopping on various spills and stains. I’ve monitored the self-emptying system’s effectiveness. I’ve tracked maintenance requirements and reliability.
This review shares the reality of living with Shark’s mid-range robot vacuum. You’ll discover which features genuinely deliver and which marketing claims fall short. I’ll compare it honestly to both budget alternatives and premium competitors.
If you’re comparing various automated cleaning options, check out our comprehensive guide to the best self emptying robot vacuums where we test models across all price points.
The Shark Matrix Plus represents Shark’s attempt to bring their traditional vacuum expertise to the robot market. It’s not the cheapest option, nor the most expensive. It aims to deliver practical performance at accessible pricing. Whether it succeeds is what this review determines.
Let’s start with what arrives when that distinctive Shark box shows up.
First Impressions and Unboxing
The Shark Matrix Plus arrives in recognisable Shark packaging. The box is substantial, measuring approximately 55cm x 50cm x 40cm. It weighs about 14 kilograms fully packed. The packaging features Shark’s characteristic blue and white branding.
Opening the box reveals well-organised compartments. The robot sits centrally, the self-empty base in a separate section. Everything is secured with cardboard inserts and minimal plastic. Shark’s packaging is environmentally conscious without compromising protection.
The robot itself makes a solid first impression. At 34.5cm diameter and 9.4cm height, it’s standard robot vacuum dimensions. The charcoal grey finish with copper accents looks modern and sophisticated. Build quality feels reassuringly substantial immediately upon handling.
The self-empty base is notably compact compared to premium competitors. It measures approximately 30cm wide, 32cm deep, and 38cm tall. This smaller footprint is a genuine advantage for tight utility rooms or small flats. The matching grey finish coordinates nicely.
Initial setup took approximately 20 minutes. I downloaded the SharkClean app, created an account, and followed the WiFi connection process. The app provided clear step-by-step instructions. Even technology novices could manage this setup comfortably.
The mopping attachment stores neatly in the base. It clicks magnetically to the robot’s underside. The microfibre pad is machine-washable and reusable. This thoughtful storage solution prevents losing small components.
First charging required three hours. The robot announced readiness with a pleasant chime. The base makes suction sounds during self-emptying that are noticeable but not excessive. It’s brief enough to avoid annoyance.
Overall first impression? This feels like a legitimate mid-range product punching above its weight. The build quality suggests Shark transferred their vacuum engineering expertise successfully. The compact base is a practical advantage over bulkier competitors.
For detailed comparisons, see how it ranks in our best self emptying robot vacuums list, where we test and score models across all price ranges.
Design and Build Quality
The Shark Matrix Plus follows conventional round robot vacuum design philosophy. At 34.5cm in diameter, it navigates under most furniture comfortably. The 9.4cm height clears typical furniture legs whilst fitting under sofas and beds easily.
Materials and Construction
The top shell is matte plastic with a soft-touch finish. It resists fingerprints effectively and doesn’t show dust as readily as glossy alternatives. After two months, scratches are minimal despite daily collisions. The materials feel premium for the price point.
The LiDAR turret is absent. Shark uses 360-degree LiDAR integrated into the top surface. This flush design prevents snagging on furniture or getting damaged. It’s a clever engineering choice that improves durability.
Underside Engineering
Underneath reveals Shark’s self-cleaning brush roll system. The comb mechanism actively removes hair tangles during operation. The main brush roll is rubber and bristle combination. Side brushes extend reach along edges.
All components remove without tools. The dustbin pulls out easily. The brush roll lifts out with simple clips. Maintenance-friendly design is evident throughout. Shark understands real-world cleaning requirements.
Self-Empty Dock Quality
The compact bagless dock feels solidly constructed. Plastic components are thick and sturdy. The dustbin removes easily for emptying. No flimsy parts that seem likely to break with regular use.
The base features integrated storage for the mopping attachment. This thoughtful inclusion prevents losing components. The design shows attention to practical daily use rather than just specifications.
Durability After Two Months
Real-world wear has been minimal. The robot’s shell shows no cracks despite numerous collisions with furniture. Wheels remain firmly attached with good tread. The self-cleaning brush mechanism continues working effectively.
The matte finish hides minor scuffs better than glossy competitors. The flush LiDAR design has prevented any turret damage. This feels built for 3-4 years of daily use comfortably.
Compared to premium competitors, the materials are less luxurious. However, compared to budget models, the construction is significantly better. For mid-range pricing, the quality exceeds expectations appropriately.
Key Features
Matrix Clean Navigation
Shark’s Matrix Clean technology cleans in a precision grid pattern. Most robots clean in straight lines. The Matrix system cleans in rows, then columns perpendicular. This ensures thorough coverage without missed spots.
In practice, it works brilliantly. Edges and corners stay noticeably cleaner. I’ve compared cleaning patterns to line-based competitors. The grid approach genuinely catches debris that others miss.
Self-Cleaning Brush Roll
The brush roll features an active comb mechanism. It pulls tangled hair off the brush automatically during cleaning. I have two long-haired cats. After two months, manual detangling has been minimal.
This low-maintenance design is genuinely appreciated. Budget models require weekly manual detangling. The Shark handles this automatically. Pet owners particularly benefit from this feature.
Bagless Self-Empty Base
The 2.1-litre bagless base holds 60 days of debris. That claim proved accurate in my testing. I’ve emptied it every 8 weeks with two cats shedding constantly. No recurring bag costs saves $35-$45 annually.
Emptying takes maybe two minutes. Remove the bin, empty it into your rubbish, rinse if needed, and reinstall. The process is straightforward. The bagless design improves long-term economics significantly.
CleanEdge Technology
Shark directs airflow along edges to pull debris from corners and skirting boards. Edge cleaning is a common robot vacuum weakness. The CleanEdge system genuinely improves performance here.
Skirting boards stay noticeably cleaner compared to robots without this technology. It’s not perfect, but it’s significantly better than average. This practical feature addresses real-world cleaning challenges.
2-in-1 Vacuum and Mop
The mopping attachment clicks on magnetically. Fill the integrated water tank, attach the microfibre pad, and enable mopping in the app. The robot vacuums and mops simultaneously.
The mopping is basic maintenance-level. It wipes rather than scrubs. Light daily grime and spills are handled adequately. Don’t expect deep stain removal. Set realistic expectations for robot mopping capability.
Voice Control Integration
Alexa and Google Assistant compatibility works reliably. “Alexa, ask Shark to clean the kitchen” starts targeted cleaning immediately. Voice control adds convenience for quick cleaning commands without opening the app.
Scheduled Cleaning and Room Selection
The app enables room-specific cleaning schedules. Clean the kitchen after dinner daily. Vacuum bedrooms weekly. This targeted approach beats whole-home cleaning for daily maintenance.
According to Shark’s official product specifications, the Matrix Clean navigation ensures 50% better edge and corner cleaning compared to traditional random pattern robots.
Performance and Real-World Testing
Hard Floor Cleaning
Performance on hardwood and tile is very good. Suction power (Shark doesn’t specify Pa ratings) handles everyday debris effectively. Crumbs, dust, pet hair, and dirt all disappear. My floors look properly clean after each session.
The Matrix Clean grid pattern genuinely improves thoroughness. Areas that line-based robots sometimes miss stay cleaner. The difference is noticeable in high-traffic zones.
Edge and Corner Performance
CleanEdge technology delivers on its promise. Edges and corners stay significantly cleaner than budget robots. It’s not perfect, some debris still requires occasional manual touch-up. However, it’s genuinely better than average.
Skirting boards that accumulated dust with previous robots stay cleaner with the Shark. This practical improvement matters in real-world use.
Carpet Performance
Low to medium-pile carpet cleans thoroughly. The suction extracts embedded dirt effectively. Pet hair lifts from carpet fibres well. The brush roll design works effectively on typical home carpets.
Deep shag carpet challenges it slightly. The suction isn’t powerful enough for a very thick pile. For typical carpets, performance is very good. Not matching premium models but significantly better than budget alternatives.
Mopping Capability
The mopping is maintenance-level rather than deep cleaning. It handles light spills and daily grime adequately. I tested it on coffee spills and juice. It wiped them away acceptably for basic robot mopping.
Dried or sticky stains require manual intervention. The lack of scrubbing pressure limits effectiveness. This supplements manual mopping rather than replacing it. Set expectations accordingly.
Battery Life Performance
The 110-minute runtime covers my 1,800 square foot home on standard power. Battery depletion mid-clean hasn’t occurred yet. Smaller to medium homes clean completely on a single charge.
Larger homes exceeding 2,000 square feet might require recharge and resume. The robot handles this automatically. Charging from empty takes approximately 3-4 hours.
Self-Emptying Effectiveness
The base empties the robot thoroughly. Minimal debris remains in the robot’s dustbin after emptying. The suction is powerful enough to transfer everything effectively.
The process takes about 15 seconds at approximately 70dB. It’s noticeable but not excessive. Schedule cleaning when the brief noise won’t disturb anyone.
Consistency Over Two Months
Performance has remained consistent. Suction hasn’t degraded. Battery life stays strong. The self-cleaning brush continues to prevent tangles. Navigation accuracy is maintained. This suggests reliable long-term operation.
For detailed comparisons, see how it ranks in our best self emptying robot vacuums list, where we test and score models across all price ranges.
Technical Specifications
Here are the key specifications explained simply:
Dimensions and Weight
- Robot: 34.5cm diameter x 9.4cm height, 3.6kg
- Dock: 30cm x 32cm x 38cm, 4kg (empty)
Power and Performance
- Suction: Not specified in Pa (Shark uses different metrics)
- Battery: Lithium-ion, 110-minute runtime
- Charging Time: 3-4 hours to full
- Coverage: Up to 1,900 square feet per charge
Capacity
- Robot Dustbin: 450ml
- Base Dustbin: 2.1L bagless (60-day capacity)
- Water Tank: 150ml (mopping function)
Noise Levels
- Cleaning: 65dB
- Self-Emptying: 70dB
Connectivity
- WiFi: 2.4GHz
- App: SharkClean (iOS and Android)
- Voice Control: Alexa, Google Assistant
Navigation System
- Technology: 360-degree LiDAR
- Mapping: Room-specific capability
- Cleaning Pattern: Matrix Clean (grid)
Important Context
The 110-minute battery life is adequate for most homes under 2,000 square feet. It’s less than some competitors offering 180+ minutes. However, it’s sufficient for typical usage.
Shark doesn’t specify suction in Pa like competitors. Testing suggests it’s comparable to 3,500-4,000Pa models. Adequate but not class-leading power.
The bagless 2.1L capacity genuinely holds 60 days of debris. The savings versus bag-based systems are significant long term.
Accessories and Tools Included
In the Box
The Shark Matrix Plus package includes:
- Matrix Plus robot vacuum
- Self-empty bagless base
- Mopping attachment with a water tank
- Two microfibre mopping pads
- Two side brushes (one pre-installed)
- Filter (pre-installed)
- Cleaning tool
- Power cord
- User manual and quick start guide
What’s Helpful
Including two mopping pads is genuinely appreciated. One washing whilst the other is in use prevents downtime. At $12-$14 for replacement pads, this inclusion adds value.
The extra side brush extends the time before purchasing replacements. Side brushes wear every 6-12 months. Having a spare is practical.
The cleaning tool helps maintain brushes and sensors. It’s simple but effective for regular maintenance tasks.
What’s Missing
Only one spare filter is included beyond the pre-installed one. Filters need replacing every 2-3 months. You’ll purchase more within six months at $14-$18 for three.
No extra main brush roll is provided. The self-cleaning mechanism extends lifespan, but eventual replacement is needed. Brush rolls cost $15-$18 each.
Ongoing Costs
Replacement mopping pads: $12-$14 for two
Filters: $14-$18 for three
Side brushes: $10-$12 for two
Main brush roll: $15-$18
Annual replacement costs run approximately $30-$40. The bagless design saves $35-$45 annually versus bag-based competitors. Long-term economics favour the bagless approach.
Value Assessment
The accessory package is adequate for immediate use. The inclusion of two mopping pads is helpful. For mid-range pricing, the provisions are reasonable.
The bagless design eliminates recurring bag costs. Over five years, you’ll save $175-$225 compared to bag-based systems. This significantly improves long-term value.
For detailed comparisons, see how it ranks in our best self emptying robot vacuums list, where we test and score models across all price ranges.
Pros and Cons
Pros
- Matrix Clean Thoroughness: The grid cleaning pattern genuinely improves coverage. Edges and corners stay noticeably cleaner. Debris that line-based patterns miss gets caught. This practical advantage shows in daily use.
- Self-Cleaning Brush Design: The automatic hair removal mechanism works brilliantly. Two long-haired cats generate relentless fur. Manual detangling has been minimal over two months. Pet owners particularly appreciate this low-maintenance feature.
- Bagless Base Saves Money: Zero recurring bag costs saves $35-$45 annually. Over five years, that’s $175-$225 saved. The long-term economics are genuinely attractive compared to bag-based competitors.
- Compact Base Footprint: The smaller base station fits tight utility rooms better than bulky premium docks. This practical advantage matters for space-constrained homes and small flats.
- Effective CleanEdge Technology: Edge and corner cleaning exceeds average robot vacuum performance. Skirting boards stay noticeably cleaner. This addresses a common robot vacuum weakness effectively.
- 2-in-1 Versatility: Vacuuming and mopping in one device adds convenience. Whilst basic, the mopping function handles maintenance adequately. One robot managing both tasks is genuinely useful.
- Excellent Value Proposition: Premium features at mid-range pricing represent solid value. Self-emptying, mopping, and good performance at $600 is competitive. You’re getting capabilities that cost $1,000+ elsewhere.
Cons
- Average Battery Life: 110 minutes is adequate but not generous. Homes exceeding 2,000 square feet require a recharge mid-clean. Competitors offer 150-180+ minute runtime at similar pricing.
- Basic Mopping Performance: The mopping is maintenance-level only. Don’t expect deep cleaning or scrubbing capability. Dried stains require manual intervention. Set realistic expectations.
- No Advanced Obstacle Avoidance: The lack of camera-based detection means cables and shoes cause stuck situations. Pre-tidying floors before cleaning reduces but doesn’t eliminate this issue.
- App Less Feature-Rich: The SharkClean app covers essentials but lacks advanced customisation. Room-specific suction control and detailed scheduling aren’t available. Basic users won’t miss these features.
- Slightly Louder Emptying: The 70dB self-emptying process is noticeably louder than some premium competitors. It’s brief but might startle light sleepers if running at night.
Who This Product Is Best For
Mid-Size Homes with Mixed Flooring
Homes between 1,000-1,900 square feet work perfectly with the 110-minute battery life. Mixed hardwood, tile, and low-pile carpet play to the Shark’s strengths. Cleaning performance excels on this combination.
Budget-Conscious Premium Seekers
People wanting self-emptying and mopping without $1,000+ pricing find excellent value. You’re sacrificing some refinement but gaining essential features affordably. The compromises are manageable for most users.
First-Time Robot Vacuum Buyers
The mid-range pricing reduces financial risk. The SharkClean app is straightforward. Performance is good enough to demonstrate robot vacuum benefits without overwhelming investment.
Homes with Lots of Edges
The CleanEdge technology benefits homes with extensive skirting boards and corners. If edge cleaning frustrates you with current robots, this addresses that weakness specifically.
People Valuing Low Maintenance
The self-cleaning brush and bagless base minimise ongoing intervention. Weekly maintenance takes maybe five minutes. Busy professionals and families appreciate this convenience.
Who Should Look Elsewhere
Large homes exceeding 2,000 square feet need longer battery life. Deep carpet-only homes need more powerful suction. People wanting advanced obstacle avoidance need camera-based systems. Tech enthusiasts wanting comprehensive app control should consider premium alternatives.
Pet Owners with Moderate Shedding
One or two pets are manageable excellently. The self-cleaning brush and adequate suction handle moderate to heavy hair. The bagless capacity manages the volume without frequent emptying.
Alternative Uses and Versatility
Whilst the Shark Self Emptying Robot Vacuum is purpose-built for floor cleaning, I’ve discovered practical applications during testing.
Scheduled Zone Cleaning
Set specific rooms to clean at different times daily. Kitchen after meals, living room after breakfast. Targeted cleaning prevents whole-home sessions for localised messes.
Pet Area Maintenance
Schedule the area around pet bowls twice daily. Food spills, water splashes, and tracked litter stay controlled. The mopping particularly helps with water bowl areas.
Weekly Room Rotation
Assign different rooms for deep cleaning on different days. Monday bedrooms, Tuesday common areas, etc. This distributes intensive cleaning throughout the week rather than one exhausting session.
Pre-Guest Quick Clean
“Clean everywhere” before guests arrive ensures presentable floors rapidly. The reliability means this actually works without pre-cleaning preparation. Floors look freshly maintained quickly.
Seasonal Deep Cleaning
Create special schedules for spring cleaning or post-holiday cleanup. The automation makes seasonal intensive cleaning manageable without overwhelming manual effort.
Monitoring Cleaning Patterns
The app’s reports show which areas accumulate dirt fastest. Patterns emerge, revealing high-traffic zones needing frequent attention. This feedback improves maintenance scheduling.
These variations leverage the scheduling and room selection features creatively. The Matrix Plus does vacuuming and mopping, but intelligent scheduling enables diverse practical applications.
For detailed comparisons, see how it ranks in our best self emptying robot vacuums list, where we test and score models across all price ranges.
Value for Money and Comparison
At approximately $550-$650, the Shark Matrix Plus sits comfortably in the mid-range robot vacuum tier. This positioning is strategic and competitive.
What You’re Paying For
The self-emptying capability typically adds $150-$200 to robot vacuum pricing. Getting this feature at mid-range cost is a primary value driver.
The bagless design eliminates $35-$45 annual bag costs. Over five years, that’s $175-$225 saved. This significantly improves long-term value versus bag-based competitors.
The 2-in-1 vacuum and mop capability adds versatility. Whilst basic, having both functions in one device at this price point is competitive.
Comparison to Alternatives
Budget self-emptying models ($400-$500) offer basic performance. They lack the Matrix Clean navigation and self-cleaning brush. You’ll experience more maintenance and less thorough cleaning.
Mid-range competitors ($600-$750) from brands like ECOVACS offer similar features. However, Shark’s brand recognition and proven track record in vacuums provide confidence. Performance is comparable.
Premium models ($900-$1,400) deliver superior suction, advanced obstacle avoidance, and better mopping. You’re paying for refinement and cutting-edge technology. The performance gap is noticeable but not always proportional to the price difference.
Long-Term Value Assessment
Over five years of ownership, expect:
- Initial purchase: $600
- Replacement parts: $150-$200
- No bag costs: $0
- Total: $750-$800
That’s $150-$160 annually for automated floor cleaning. Compare this to premium models costing $1,200+ initially, plus $175-$225 in bags. The value advantage is substantial.
Honest Assessment
Is it worth $600? Absolutely, for most mid-size homes with mixed flooring. You’re getting solid performance, proven brand reliability, and practical features. The compromises are manageable.
The Matrix Clean navigation and self-cleaning brush are genuine value-adds. These aren’t marketing gimmicks. They deliver practical benefits in daily use.
Maintenance and Long-Term Ownership
Weekly Tasks
Empty the bagless dustbin every 6-8 weeks. This takes maybe two minutes. Remove the bin, empty it into the rubbish, rinse if desired, dry completely, and reinstall.
Wipe the robot’s sensors and charging contacts. Dust affects navigation accuracy. A soft cloth takes 30 seconds weekly. This maintains optimal performance.
Wash the mopping pad after every 2-3 uses. Machine wash on a gentle cycle or hand wash. Air dry completely before reattaching. Clean pads prevent odours and maintain effectiveness.
Monthly Maintenance
Clean or replace the filter monthly. Remove, tap out dust, and rinse under water if washable. Let dry completely before reinstalling. Replace every 2-3 months with new filters.
Check the self-cleaning brush roll for any missed tangles. The mechanism handles most hair automatically. Occasionally, inspect and remove any stubborn accumulation.
Inspect side brushes for wear. Replace if the bristles are bent or broken significantly. The included spare extends the time before purchasing more.
Replacement Part Costs
Mopping pads: $12-$14 for two (every 4-6 months)
Filters: $14-$18 for three (every 6-9 months)
Side brushes: $10-$12 for two (annually)
Main brush roll: $15-$18 (every 12-18 months)
Annual costs run approximately $30-$40. This is reasonable for mid-range pricing. Parts availability through Shark’s website and retailers is excellent.
Common Issues
Occasionally, the robot reports errors when the dustbin isn’t seated properly. Remove and reinstall firmly. The error clears immediately.
The self-emptying process is louder than some competitors. Schedule cleaning when 15 seconds of 70dB noise won’t disturb anyone.
Expected Lifespan
Shark’s traditional vacuum reliability suggests 4-5 years of daily use is reasonable. The self-cleaning brush extends component lifespan. Battery degradation becomes the limiting factor after 3-4 years.
Warranty Coverage
Shark provides a one-year limited warranty covering manufacturing defects. Extended warranties are available for purchase. Shark’s customer service reputation is solid based on traditional vacuum experience.
Reasons to Buy This Product
You Want Proven Brand Reliability
Shark’s established reputation in vacuums provides confidence. They understand suction, filtration, and brush design. This expertise translates successfully to robot vacuums.
You Have Pets That Shed
The self-cleaning brush roll handles pet hair brilliantly. Two long-haired cats don’t overwhelm it. The bagless capacity manages the volume. Pet owners particularly benefit.
You Value Long-Term Savings
The bagless design eliminates $35-$45 annual bag costs. Over five years, you’ll save $175-$225. Combined with competitive initial pricing, long-term economics are attractive.
You Want 2-in-1 Convenience
Vacuuming and mopping in one device at mid-range pricing adds value. Whilst basic, the mopping handles maintenance adequately. One robot managing both is convenient.
You Have Space Constraints
The compact base station fits tight utility rooms and small flats better than bulky premium docks. This practical advantage matters significantly for space-limited homes.
You Prefer Bagless Systems
No recurring bag purchases or disposal hassles appeal to many users. Simply empty, rinse, and reuse. The convenience and savings compound over the years.
You Need Better Edge Cleaning
CleanEdge technology genuinely improves corner and skirting board performance. If edge cleaning frustrates you currently, this addresses that weakness specifically.
For detailed comparisons, see how it ranks in our best self emptying robot vacuums list, where we test and score models across all price ranges.
Reasons to Skip This Product
You Have Very Large Homes
Homes exceeding 2,000 square feet might require a recharge mid-clean. The 110-minute battery life is adequate but not generous. Larger spaces need longer runtime models.
You Need Maximum Suction Power
The suction is adequate but not class-leading. Deep carpet or heavily embedded dirt might require multiple passes. If power is your priority, premium alternatives deliver more.
You Want Advanced Obstacle Avoidance
The lack of camera-based detection means cables and shoes cause stuck situations. If you can’t pre-tidy floors, camera-based premium models are safer choices.
You Need Comprehensive Mopping
The mopping is basic maintenance-level. Don’t expect scrubbing or deep stain removal. If mopping performance is crucial, dedicated mopping robots are better.
You Want Extensive App Features
The SharkClean app covers essentials but lacks advanced customisation. Tech enthusiasts wanting granular control might find it too basic.
For comprehensive alternatives, check our complete best self emptying robot vacuums buying guide, where we review options across all budgets and needs.
Conclusion
After two months of daily testing, I can provide a clear verdict on the Shark Self Emptying Robot Vacuum. The Matrix Plus 2-in-1 is a solid mid-range robot vacuum that delivers practical performance whilst accepting strategic compromises to achieve competitive pricing.
The value proposition is compelling. Self-emptying convenience, 2-in-1 capability, and proven Shark reliability at $600 represents genuine value. You’re getting features that cost $1,000+ elsewhere. The bagless design eliminates recurring costs, whilst the Matrix Clean navigation delivers noticeably better coverage.
Cleaning performance exceeded my expectations for the price point. Hard floors are properly cleaned. Low-pile carpet cleans thoroughly. The Matrix Clean grid pattern genuinely catches debris that line-based robots miss. CleanEdge technology delivers superior corner performance. The self-cleaning brush handles pet hair brilliantly.
However, the Shark Matrix Plus accepts compromises. Battery life is adequate but not generous. Mopping is basic rather than comprehensive. Obstacle avoidance is absent. The app lacks advanced features. These limitations are manageable but worth acknowledging.
My recommendation: Buy the Shark Self Emptying Robot Vacuum if you want self-emptying and mopping without premium pricing. The Matrix Plus delivers solid performance, proven brand reliability, and practical features at an accessible cost. Pet owners particularly benefit.
Skip it if you have very large homes needing extended battery life, require maximum suction power, or want advanced obstacle avoidance. Premium alternatives offer refinement worth the extra cost for specific needs.
For detailed comparisons, see how it ranks in our best self emptying robot vacuums list, where we test and score models across all price ranges.
The ideal Matrix Plus owner has a home between 1,000-1,900 square feet with mixed hard floors and low-pile carpet. They have pets or value a low-maintenance operation. They’re budget-conscious but want quality. They trust established brands and value practical features over cutting-edge technology.
The best alternative? If you want similar features with longer battery life, consider models from ECOVACS or Roborock at $700-$900. If you don’t need mopping, vacuum-only models offer better suction at $450-$550. For budget buyers, non-self-emptying Shark options cost $350-$450.
For me personally? I’m genuinely impressed by what Shark delivers at this price point. Their vacuum expertise translates successfully to robots. The Matrix Clean navigation is genuinely better. The self-cleaning brush works brilliantly. The bagless design saves money long-term.
Is it perfect? No. Battery life could be longer. Mopping could be more capable. Obstacle avoidance would improve daily use. But these compromises are acceptable given the pricing.
The Shark Self Emptying Robot Vacuum proves you don’t need to spend $1,000+ for solid automated floor cleaning. It delivers 80% of premium performance at 60% of the cost. For budget-conscious buyers wanting reliability and practical features, that’s a winning combination. For more detailed comparisons and alternatives, visit our best self emptying robot vacuums guide where we test and rank options for every budget and need.
I
